We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
By
Steven Clemons, Senior Fellow, The New America Foundation,
Rohan Gunaratna, Director, Institute of Defense and Strategic Studies,
Ursula Mueller, Minister, Embassy of the Federal Republic of Germany to the United States,
Georg Mascolo, Washington Bureau Chief, Der Spiegel
Why did al Qaeda attack America's most iconic landmarks on 9/11? I ask this question of my American friends and they tell me that al Qaeda does not like our values. I want to tell you that al Qaeda has no problem at all with your values. Al Qaeda's problem is with your foreign policy. And if we look at the founding charter of al Qaeda, it was created as the pioneering vanguard of the Islamic movement.
Al Qaeda was created for the very purpose of leading this fight. The predecessor organization of al Qaeda, known as Makhtab al-Khidamat (MAK, the Afghan Services Bureau), played a very critical role in the anti-Soviet, multinational, Afghan Mujahideen campaign, a campaign that finally led to the defeat of the largest land army at that time in Afghanistan.
In many ways the battle that al Qaeda is conducting today is an attack on the remaining superpower. The strategic threat posed by al Qaeda has been underestimated by the Americans and by their allies and friends. Specifically, the Western response to fighting al Qaeda has been an event-driven response. It must be a campaign-driven one. The current response to al Qaeda has been largely a response that I would say is called a Rumsfeld approach.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.